A
description of the meeting, who was there, action items and
the next meeting date.
Executive Council
Thursday, February 5th
Present:
Elaine P., Mike R., Joe B., Rob B., Frank S., Steve H., Bob
S., Dick T., Laurie S., Madeline Y., Dick T., Dick K, Joan
P. and Dave C. Staff: Ray P. & Bob J. Guests: Nancy Thomas,
Kathy Buck, Bob Goudreau and Ken Page.
Welcome
to Joe Bowen: The meeting started and Elaine welcomed everyone
and then introduced Joe Bowen as a new member of the Executive
Council. Joe is the Principal of West Rutland School.
Reports:
President’s
Report-Elaine talked about her and Laurie attending a VCSEA
meeting and we will discuss later whether to have two of our
EC members to go to their board.
NAESP
Report-Dave C. sent out an electronic mailing about NAESP.
He encouraged people to check the web site and Ray’s musings.
Membership reports from NAESP are confusing. He then handed
out membership statistics by State and Zone. The Northeast
meeting will be earlier in the fall next year (late October
or early November). He also discussed the hopes of the group
to have the agenda tie into the national agenda.
NASSP
Report-Bob S. discussed the NASSP convention in Orlando. He
will be voting on the President of the organization at the
meeting. There will be a discussion about possible joining
with NAESP. Bob talked about his membership efforts he makes
for the national association. He suggested that we divide
up and have phone calls made by people in various regions.
The theme of the conference will be the start of the Breaking
Ranks II report. Bob also talked about the regional meetings.
Elaine talked about the web page legislative email alerts
that are easy to do. Bob S. reminded us that our three congressional
delegates are always behind education. Frank S. asked if either
association is discussing middle level. The answer, both are.
Bob S. said that both organizations want it for the membership
money.
Federal
Relations Report-Dick T. said that Bob gave his report. Dick
agreed with Bob about our delegation. Dick is going to the
federal relations conference next month. He mentioned the
issue of funding NCLBA and the funding of voucher schools
for D.C. schools. The vouchers would be good for public and
private schools. The spending bill does call for increasing
IDEA spending up to 20%, an increase from 16.8%. Then money
towards professional leadership development is down about
a percent.
Executive Director’s Report
1. Executive
Council Terms of Office
Ray introduced
the subject to try to get clarity about the current terms
that people are serving. The language in the by-laws is confusing
and it was agreed that it should be made clearer. The following
opinions and comments were shared:
- Joan felt it should be for two elected terms.
- Dick T. said that Scott had told him that membership on
the council was for two consecutive terms. This will help
to bring in new blood.
- Mike R. agreed with Dick T. about two consecutive terms.
- Peter E. felt it was encouraging that so many people were
interested in the opening that Joe now has. He agreed with
the notion of two consecutive terms.
- Dave C. talked about how Bruce G. enjoyed the last process
being more inclusive.
- Madeline Y. agreed with Ray and felt that two terms should
be automatic if the person desires it, but agrees to two consecutive
terms.
- Frank S. supports the same notion for two reasons. Until
last year he didn’t know how people on Exec. Council and opening
it up is therefore important. It’s cleaner if you know the
extent of the term.
- Steve H. talked about how you start on a committee to learn
the ropes before you get to know the routines.
- Bob J. mentioned that ASC does not have a past chair.
- Joan P. felt we should advertise openings and the Executive
Council would review bios at the April meeting. Elaine P.
agreed and reminded us that would be the same as the process
Ray used for the opening filled by Joe B.
- Bob S. made a motion for Ray to rewrite the bylaws so that
the terms for Executive Council and ASC be clearly defined,
and include the notion of balance (gender, school size, etc.)
and also that people would serve two consecutive elected terms.
It was agreed that if someone was appointed to fill out a
term, he or she would still be able to have two terms. He
will draft language for the April meeting. The motion was
seconded by Laurie S. Motion approved.
- Given the discussion about terms, we will have two openings
this year: Joan Paustian and Mike Redington. Elaine P. recommended
that we use the same process that we used for the opening
when Tony K. left. Ray will advertise the opening via email
and bios of all interested candidates will be presented at
the April Executive Council meeting.
2. Ray
handed out the membership report.
- Bob S. recommended that non-members be allowed to continue
to get “Ray’s Musings” for one-year trial, and then if they
want to continue they have to become members. Ray and Marie
will work out a procedure to do this.
- Ray will send Executive Council members a list of members.
3. Financial
Report- handed out and budget process discussed. Ray said
that he will present a proposed budget at the April meeting.
It will be in a different format with the following four columns:
Budget 2002-03, Actual 2002-03, Budget 2003-04, Proposed 2004-05.
Director of Student Activities
1. Bob
handed out a sheet that had the actions taken by the ASC meeting
on 1/29/04.
(please refer to handout) He presented information on each
decision. There were discussions and questions on the following
items.
- Based
on the questions, Bob responded that the NFHS recommended
mouth guards for baseball/softball. They are not yet required.
When they are required by NFHS, we will then comply.
- Spring football was discussed. After some questions about
the rationale for the decision. Bob explained the reasons
that were presented at the ASC.
- Recommendation about upping percentage of games was discussed.
One recommendation was to have those at only 60% be penalized
instead of ruled out. ASC will consider and discuss at their
next meeting before making final recommendation. Frank asked
for a picture of the actual numbers at the next meeting. Elaine
and Bob S. both said that we have to do what is best for kids
and letting them play.
2. Bob
J. handed out a listing of the championship dates. Elaine
asked if we need help at any events. Some people signed up
for various events. Others can let Bob know.
3. Discussion
of consistency of awards that are given out. Some concerns
were expressed about some sports handing out awards other
than those offered by the VPA. Ray and Bob are working on
it.
Minutes
December 12, 2003
• Mike
R., Joan, Bob S., Frank S., Steve H., Bruce G. were there,
add
• Motion to approve as amended by Dick T. second by Dick K.
Motion passed.
Status
Report
-Ray and
Bob presented an update of the strategic plan (Please refer
to handout). After going through the report, Ray mentioned
that he will ask Barbara Iverson to delete the e-newsletter
offering from the web page. The weekly musings will be the
in its place. There was agreement that the newsletter was
no longer necessary given the weekly emails from Ray and Bob.
Reflections-
Elaine asked each person to give their thoughts on how things
were going so far with Ray and Bob on board. Here are the
comments that were made:
• good
that we’re at state house with the other organizations
• Ray discussed the role that Bob J. plays in allowing Ray
to be at the legislature and with other organizations. Bob
is doing a great job of leading the activities side of the
organization.
• not concerned about some things not being done given the
increased presence at the legislature-that has to be a priority.
• good teamwork between Bob and Ray
• Bob-great job also. We have to find the skeletons as Ray
and Bob complete their first year. Ray should suggest changes
in future.
• I like the sounds of the number of connections made and
networking with groups. collaborations have improved.
• Great response from Bob in helping to support athletics.
• Madeline Y. I echo everything said. It’s exciting. Enjoys
Ray’s Musings.
• Laurie said that feedback from principals and AD is very
positive. Pleased the ways the things are being handled. Make
sure you check the reasonableness of your jobs.
• Dave C. knows that our presence is felt. Watching Ray interact
with other state execs shows evidence of good rapport.
• Steve H. will reserve judgment until I know what will happen
with spring football. It’s been a great run so far.
• Rob B. says that positive comments about what we’re doing.
• Joe B. My 23rd year in VPA and didn’t have desire to be
involved due to sports only. But now, I applied
• Frank S. I would echo with a couple of specifics. The lack
of any bad press is great. I was apprehensive after the first
meeting because Ray seemed to be stressing financial issues.
I’m very happy that over the six months that is not the case.
There were times we gave in too easily in the past. It hasn’t
happened yet. I am confident and hopeful that you’ll respond
more with the will of the group or draw the line somewhere.
• Dick K. feedback form principals getting answers, positive
response. Other feedback very positive and sometimes confused
statements about VPA is in staff development. How come all
of a sudden. I’m pleased that we’re able to do both. There
is also positive feedback from legislators. They appreciate
to know that there is someone from VPA there and enjoy Ray’s
gentle humor.
• Mike appreciates the development of a strategic plan that
is doable. The direction we’ve chosen is going to benefit
us all in the future. Work in legislature is important and
worth the time.
• Bob J. discussed the positive climate Ray has helped create
at the VPA office.
• Elaine-I echo what others said. We are setting structures
that will help in the future.
• Ray did the cork trick.
Legislative
Report
Ray gave
out a handout that had a summary of the legislative report.
(Please refer to the handout.) He then reviewed the bills
listed and sought input on others. The following were reviewed:
• The
Commissioner’s Response to Mandates report (Please refer to
handout).
• A summary of the Cost Containment Report was handed out.
The recommendations were read and reviewed.
• Ray handed out the revised Harassment bill (H.113). He reviewed
the process he was involved in which included about six meetings
with the bill’s sponsor, Joel Cook (VT-NEA), Jeff Francis
(VSA), John Nelson (VSBA), and Bill Reedy (DOE). It also included
testimony at the House Judiciary Committee on three occasions.
The compromise bill has many improvements over the original
bill. Those were outlined by Ray.
• H.490 Repeal of the Governor’s Diploma. Ray said that he
felt this would be on the fast track for approval.
• S.260 An Act Dealing with Participation in State Championship
Tournaments.
• S.281 An Act to Establish A Civics Education Program. Ray
discussed the Commissioner’s recommendation at the Senate
Education committee that civics ed could be discussed without
legislation.
• S.282 Foreign Language Credit for Immigrants.
• School Choice. Ray asked for input so that he would have
a VPA stance to share at a public hearing next Wednesday night.
At this point, Nancy Thomas and Kathy Buck from VCSEA joined
us and they participated in the discussion. Nancy discussed
the issues around special ed in relation to who decides where
they go and who pays. After some more general discussion,
about the current law (ACT 150), transportation and equity
issues, Dick K. suggested a statement for the VPA. It was
agreed that he would type it into the computer at the end
of this meeting so that we could discuss it in the morning.
Discussion
about VPA and VCSEA Collaboration
As mentioned
above, Nancy Thomas and Kathy Buck joined us to discuss some
of the ideas that they and Elaine P. and Laurie S. have discussed
about collaboration between our two organizations.
VCSEA-Elaine
gave a brief update about prior efforts. Nancy discussed how
they wanted to increase collaboration with principals. Elaine
went to fall annual meeting and Laurie and Elaine went to
a meeting a couple of weeks ago.
Roundtable
discussion: Nancy T. mentioned that she, Ray and Jeff Francis
met last week to discuss the concept of superintendents. principals
and SPED directors having roundtable discussions. Hopefully
regions will invite superintendents and principals to meetings
this spring. Kathy added that maybe we should look at sharing
best practices and models in dealing with special ed. How
can we utilize resources better. Nancy handed out a list of
Exec. Officers and regional reps for VCSEA. We need to work
together to build educational support system. Also the notion
of working together on the issue of highly qualified para
educators.
Other
ideas included the fact that Elaine P. and Laurie S. would
go to their meetings and they would send two to ours. Ray
mentioned that he has been invited to the VT-ASCD Planning
Committee meeting. We are hopeful that the VT-ASCD, VCSEA
and VPA will all co-sponsor a fall conference.
Regional
Meetings
Ken Page
reported that they have had a couple of meetings. There will
be one on March 17th of March. Commissioner Kate will be there.
Ken would like ideas on topics for the Commissioner. He discussed
what they have done and will do, including spin off groups.
Bob Goodreau
said that they had one meeting so far this fall. The second
has been planned for Ruby Paine day. It was suggested that
at each meeting you decide some practical thing to discuss
the next time. For example, Nancy’s group went over report
cards. Have a particular topic. Rob mentioned that they also
have critical friends groups set up.
We all
agreed that we have to sustain the regions even if the numbers
are sometimes slow. Elaine thanked Ken and Bob for their work.
True Colors
Elaine
handed out a set of cards to each of us and we had to pick
one of the four colors that we felt depicted our personality.
The meeting then adjourned for the day. It was agreed that
we would continue our discussion of school choice and other
legislative stances in the morning.
Friday,
February 06
Present:
Elaine P., Mike R., Joe B., Rob B., Frank S., Steve H., Bob
S., Dick T., Laurie S., Dick T., Joan P. and Dave C. Staff:
Ray P. & Bob J. Guest: David Ford
Discussion
on Legislation Continued
• Ray
read the statement that was typed by Dick:
It the
sense of the VPA that: We strongly support creating and providing
opportunities for our youth. We understand that creating choice
is consistent with creating opportunity. We have, as an Association,
created and supported initiatives that are thoughtful and
that we have subsequently held to analysis. We believe that
the State of Vermont has encouraged programs of choice to
be implemented that are not yet completed and that have not
yet been held to the scrutiny and analysis consistent with
thoughtful policy implementation. We recommend that the present
initiatives continue as planned and receive analysis and review
before the implementation of new public policy.
Ray suggested
that information about ACT 150 be included.
Mike R.
moved and Rob B. seconded. Motion approved.
• Ray
explained the bill dealing with Home School driver education.
After some discussion it was decided that the main concern
was equity. If this is allowed for home school students, then
it should be an option for others.
• Nutrition and Obesity bills
- Physical Ed/guided activity requirements are not practical
from cost and space issues.
- Encourage schools to Limit vending machines to nutritious
foods and drink
Dues Proposal
Ray’s
Dues Proposal presented in handout. Motion by to increase
dues to $275 and $160 for next year (ray’s proposal) through
the year 2006-07, rounded to the nearest $5. Further dues
increases would be reviewed in subsequent summer retreats.
Rob B. moved the above and Joe B. seconded. It was approved.
Therefore, we will bring the following proposal to the membership
for dues for the next three years:
| School
Year |
Active |
Associate |
| Current |
$250 |
$150 |
| 2004-05 |
$275 |
$160 |
| 2005-06 |
$285 |
$165 |
| 2006-07 |
$290 |
$170 |
VELA Presentation
David
presented a power point about the VELA legacy. We then reconvened
and David took input from the group about the project. He
also gave his contact information so that people could get
in touch with feedback.
Meeting
Dates
• The
date of the next meeting has been changed to April 8th. We’ll
meet from 10:00 to 2:00 at 2 Prospect St. Lunch will be provided.
• The summer retreat will be:
- ASC:
August 10th and 11th
- EC: August 11th and 12th
|